The method of value orientations of Rokich

The desire to look under the human skull and find out what is going on in his little world is common to many people. Smart psychologists napridumyvali set of tests to reveal the mystery of the human being. One of the interesting ways is Rokich's method of studying the value orientations of the personality. This test does not help to find out the level of intelligence, does not tell about the most promising areas of personal development, but it will allow you to learn about a person's attitude to the world, to himself and other people.

Rokich's method: the study of value orientations of personality

The methodology developed by Rokich is based on the method of direct ranking of life values. In total, the scientist distinguishes two categories of values.

  1. Terminal values ​​consist of beliefs that the goal of personal existence is the path that has been passed to it. For example, active life, having friends, interesting work, material security, health, etc.
  2. Instrumental values ​​include the belief that some kind of personality trait or mode of action is preferable in any situation. For example, intolerance to one's own and other people's shortcomings, self-control, good breeding, independence, tolerance, etc.

For the test, a person is offered two lists of values ​​of 18 positions each. The test person must rank the values ​​in terms of the degree of significance for themselves.

List A (terminal values):

List B (instrumental values):

Based on the test results, the psychologist makes a conclusion about the "life philosophy" of the person. Moreover, a grouping of values ​​on different grounds is conducted to capture the individual pattern of the client's life principles. If such regularities can not be established, this may indicate that the system of values ​​of life is not formed in a person or about his insincerity.

Pros and cons of the Rokich method for the diagnosis of value orientations

An essential advantage of the methodology is its convenience, universality and cost-effectiveness of conducting research and processing results. And also the technique is very flexible - it is possible to vary lists of values, selecting the most indicative for a particular case.

The downside of the methodology is that a person should be interested in giving answers as honestly as possible, the possibility of insincerity makes the test results unreliable. Therefore, for testing of this kind, there must be a trust relationship between the client and the psychologist.