Recently, the Beckham family is uneasy. In the press, they began to talk about the fact that the stellar couple made the final decision on divorce. However, Victoria and David did not give any official statements on this matter, and there was no reason for fans to think about the collapse of the pair, with the exception of the gradual division of the capital acquired in marriage.
Divorce or section of the sphere of influence?
The information that Victoria and David decided to part ways appeared after the documents were published that said that in December 2014 the man had left the post of director of Beckham Brand Ltd, where he worked for 6 years. After that, the company's entire capital was divided into three equal parts, which went to David, Victoria and CEO Robert Dodds. In addition, all contracts related to the David Beckham brand were transferred to DB Ventures Limited, a subsidiary of Beckham Brand Ltd. This company will now work only with the trademark of David, without the participation of his wife.
It is worth noting that the couple refused to comment on this issue, but their representative said that the operation to divide the sphere of influence is normal. "The decision of a star couple to restructure companies and separate their brands from each other is an accounting question," he said at last.
Read also- The most funny and funny moments and Internet memes from the wedding of Prince Harry and Megan Markle!
- All that was hidden from us: details of the royal wedding
- Victoria Beckham boasted talents of younger children
Beckhams quietly sell their property
In the spring of 2014, the couple sold the notorious "Buckingham Palace", which was in the English county of Hertfordshire. After this in the summer of 2015, David sold his mansion in Madrid. In the autumn of the same year, the star couple sold a French villa on the Cote d'Azur. Not so long ago it became known that Victoria put up for sale her exclusive Range Rover Evoque, whose design elements she was engaged in alone.
However, we should not panic ahead of time, because if the division of property took place in preparation for the divorce, David would not invest his money in promoting the brand of his wife, and he does it with enviable constancy.
| | | |
| | | |
