Sometimes, to achieve certain goals, we lack the incentive to act, motivate. It is motivation that is the engine of the majority, determining the initiative of a person, as well as the quality and speed of performing various tasks. And one of the main motivations is the motivation for success, which will be discussed in this article.
The first to introduce the notion of achievement motivation was the American psychologist G. Murray. He identified several competitive aspects of this motivation, and the person can compete with himself to achieve success. The result of this motivational tendency is constant self-improvement and a desire to cope with something difficult.
Later, other scientists who worked on the theory of achievement motivation (and successes as well), distinguished somewhat different (and sometimes contradictory) aspects. It has often been suggested that for people motivated to achieve, the average level of complexity of the tasks is optimal. In addition, the result of their solution should depend almost entirely on the person himself, and not on the case.
However, the desire to show high results and, as a result, to succeed, is inherent, first of all, to people initiative and responsible. Motivation to achieve the goal requires the presence of certain character traits that set this or that behavior.
The problem of motivation for success
The psychology of motivation to achieve success is closely linked with the desire to avoid failure. These two concepts are not as similar as they may appear at first glance, because, depending on the goal (to achieve success or avoid failure), the method of obtaining the desired result is chosen.
Motivation to achieve the goal is often associated with a calculated risk, that is, it is important for a person to be sure of getting it. The prevalence of this motivational tendency often forces us to set medium targets for implementation, or slightly overestimated (recall the desire for self-improvement). And how not
Interesting is the fact that it is those who try to avoid failure, in the case of simple skills, they act faster and more efficiently than people motivated for success. And if the task is not simple, then, as a rule, "successful" ones are pulled forward. Therefore, in different situations, different aspirations are more effective for achieving the set goal.